Soil resistant floor treatment

ABSTRACT

A soil resistant floor surface treatment composition is provided. In particular, a composition comprises a maleic/olefin copolymer and an optional cleaning agent. Methods for treating a porous floor surface with a soil resistant agent and kits comprising a floor treatment composition, an applicator, a removal agent for removing a plurality of soils from a treated surface, and instructions for use are further provided by the present invention.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 61/422,373, entitled “Soil ResistantFloor Cleaner,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No.61/422,376, entitled “Soil Resistance Floor Treatment,” each of whichwere filed on Dec. 13, 2010. The entire contents of these patentapplications are hereby expressly incorporated herein by referenceincluding, without limitation, the specification, claims, and abstract,as well as any figures, tables, or drawings thereof.

This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______(Attorney Docket Number 2816USU1), entitled “Soil Resistant FloorCleaner,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ (Attorney DocketNumber 2815USU2), entitled “Soil Resistant Floor Treatment,” each ofwhich are filed on even date herewith. This application is also relatedto U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ (Attorney Docket Number2769USU2), entitled “Soil Resistant Cleaner and Surface Treatment,” andU.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ (Attorney Docket Number2769USU1), entitled “Soil Resistant Surface Treatment,” each of whichare filed on even date herewith and each of which is acontinuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/617,121(Attorney Docket Number 2586US01) filed on Nov. 12, 2009, entitled“Composition and Method for Removal of Polymerized Non-Trans Fats.” Thisapplication is also related to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser.No. 61/422,278, entitled “Acrylate-Olefin Co-Polymers as Soil ResistantSurface Treatment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No.61/422,280, entitled “Acrylates as Soil Resistant Surface Treatment,”and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/422,282, entitled“Soil Resistant Surface Treatment,” each of which were filed on Dec. 13,2010. The entire contents of these patent applications are herebyexpressly incorporated herein by reference including, withoutlimitation, the specification, claims, and abstract, as well as anyfigures, tables, or drawings thereof.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to soil resistant floor surface treatments. Inparticular, the invention relates to floor treatment compositions, kitsand methods of cleaning surfaces using the compositions.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A variety of compositions are available for cleaning and/or treatingstone surfaces such as concrete, terrazzo and marble to reduce soilcontamination. Conventional floor treatments, such as StoneMedicAbsorbent Stone Impregnator™ (ASI) from Ecolab are applied as aconcentrated liquid. The floor treatments may be allowed to stand on thefloor surface for several minutes before the excess liquid is removed,and the treated floor may be re-opened traffic several hours after theapplication. It would be beneficial to provide a surface treatment thatresists soil contamination and staining, but does not require specialapplication procedures or long drying times.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In an embodiment, the present invention is a method for treating a floorsurface. The method includes applying to the floor surface an aqueoussolution comprising about 0.005 wt % to about 20 wt % of a maleic/olefincopolymer composition having a molecular weight of about 1,000 to about20,000 g/mol. The method also includes drying the surface such that acoating or layer including the copolymer is disposed on the surface.

In another embodiment, the present invention is a floor treatmentcomposition. The floor cleaning composition includes: 1) at least onemaleic/olefin copolymer having a molecular weight of about 1,000 toabout 20,000 g/mol; 2) optionally, at least one amphoteric acryliccopolymer; and 3) optionally, at least one detergent. A treatment systemcomprising first and second containers including the maleic/olefincopolymer and detergent, respectively is also provided. Optionally, theat least one amphoteric acrylic copolymer may be provided in the firstcontainer, the second container, or in a third container.

In another embodiment, the present invention is a laminate that includesa floor substrate having a surface and a coating or layer disposed onthe surface. The coating or layer includes at least one anti-soil agentcomprising a maleic/olefin copolymer. The floor surface may be porous ornon-porous.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Embodiments of this invention include soil resistant floor treatmentcompositions, articles, methods of use, and kits or cleaning systems,which can vary as understood by skilled artisans. It is further to beunderstood that all terminology used herein is for the purpose ofdescribing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to belimiting in any manner or scope. For example, as used in thisspecification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and“the” can include plural referents unless the content clearly indicatesotherwise. Further, all units, prefixes, and symbols may be denoted inits SI accepted form. Numeric ranges recited within the specificationare inclusive of the numbers defining the range and include each integerwithin the defined range.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used hereinhave the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill inthe art to which embodiments of the invention pertain. Many methods andmaterials similar, modified, or equivalent to those described herein canbe used in the practice of the embodiments of the present inventionwithout undue experimentation, the preferred materials and methods aredescribed herein. In describing and claiming the embodiments of thepresent invention, the following terminology will be used in accordancewith the definitions set out below.

The term “about,” as used herein, refers to variation in the numericalquantity that can occur, for example, through typical measuring andliquid handling procedures used for making concentrates or use solutionsin the real world; through inadvertent error in these procedures;through differences in the manufacture, source, or purity of theingredients used to make the compositions or carry out the methods; andthe like. The term “about” also encompasses amounts that differ due todifferent equilibrium conditions for a composition resulting from aparticular initial mixture. Whether or not modified by the term “about”,the claims include equivalents to the quantities refers to variation inthe numerical quantity that can occur.

The term “weight percent,” “wt %,” “percent by weight,” “% by weight,”and variations thereof, as used herein, refer to the concentration of asubstance as the weight of that substance divided by the total weight ofthe composition and multiplied by 100. It is understood that, as usedhere, “percent,” “%,” and the like are intended to be synonymous with“weight percent,” “wt %,” etc.

According to an embodiment of the invention a novel stain resistantfloor treatment composition, treated article and methods of use of thesame are provided. The stain resistant floor treatment compositionprovides stain resistant activity that may facilitate the removal ofsoil by simple mechanical means, such as a water spray, air flow and/ormechanical means alone. In addition, treated floor surfaces reduce theintensity and frequency of required cleaning activities making thetreated surface easier to clean. The soil resistant floor treatmentcomposition of the invention can be applied to a wide variety of varyingporosity floor surfaces, including marble, granite, terrazzo, concrete,dry shake, ceramic tiles, wood, laminate, linoleum, vinyl, cork, bambooand rubber. Porous stone floor surfaces such as concrete, terrazzo, dryshake and ceramic flooring surfaces may be particularly suitable fortreatment.

Additionally, the soil resistant floor treatment composition of thepresent invention can be applied to porous or non-porous flooringsurfaces having a coating. Examples of coatings include but are notlimited to factory-applied coatings, jobsite-applied coatings, andfloors treated with restorers. Factory-applied coatings are applied tothe flooring substrates before the substrate pieces are installed at ajobsite. Jobsite-applied coatings are applied to the flooring substratesafter the substrate pieces have been installed. Restorers are applied tothe coated floor surfaces as an interim maintenance step instead ofscrubbing or stripping the floor of previous coatings and applying a newcoating. The coating may include one component or multi componentsystems which may be applied as single or multiple layers. Finishes usedfor coating a floor surface and/or substrate include acrylic,polyurethanes, epoxy coatings, UV curable compositions, and aziridinecrosslinked floor finishes. Examples of acrylic-based coatings includeGemstar Stratus, GemStar Laser, and Taj Mahal from Ecolab. Examples ofpolyurethane-based coatings include Maxx Durable and the Courtmaster IISystem from Ecolab.

Compositions

In one embodiment, the stain resistant floor treatment compositioncomprises, consists essentially of or consists of at least one soilresistant agent. A soil resistant agent refers to a chemical agent thatreduces the severity of a stain (e.g., repels staining) on a floorsurface caused by soil contact, and/or promotes easier stain removal(e.g., releases stains) from a floor surface by decreasing thepenetration and/or adhesion of soil on the surface through floor surfacemodification or other physical or chemical mechanisms.

Particularly suitable soil resistant agents include polycarboxylatecopolymers of maleic/olefin and their salts and derivates, moreparticularly, a derivative having a maleic/hydrophobically-modifiedolefin copolymer. The olefin segment may include a variety of linear,branched and cyclic alkenes. Suitable alkenes may include or be derivedfrom propylene, ethylene, or butylene. Particularly suitable alkenes mayinclude or be derived from butylene, for example, isobutylene anddiisobutylene. Other suitable stain resistant agents include siliconematerials such as polydimethysiloxane materials (e.g., Wacker HC303 fromWacker Silicones), fluorochemical materials (e.g., Capstone ST100 andST300 from Dupont), polycarboxylate copolymers (e.g., Acusol 460 fromDow), and acrylic polymers (Rhoplex EZ Clean 200 from Dow, Polyquart®Pro, Polyquart® Ampho 149, and PolyQuart® EcoClean from Cognis). Anycombination of the foregoing agents may also be used to provide enhancedstain resistance. According to one embodiment, the soil resistant agentis substantially free of fluorinated or silicone substituents. Accordingto a further embodiment the maleic/hydrophobicly-modified olefincopolymer does not exhibit viscosity-building or any threshold activity.According to one embodiment the composition is substantially free orfree of volatile organic compounds. According to a still furtherembodiment the composition is substantially free or free of alkalisoluble resins, plasiticizers, solvents such as volatile organiccompound containing (VOC) solvents, and waxes. According to a stillfurther embodiment the composition is substantially free or free ofthreshold agents and/or rheology modifiers.

The stain resistant floor treatment composition may further compriseadditional soil resistant agents to provide improved and/or synergisticsoil resistance. These additional soil resistant agents can have abeneficial impact on gloss as well. Suitable additional soil resistantagents include acrylic copolymers. Particularly suitable acryliccopolymers are amphoteric acrylic copolymers and have molecular weightsof at least 5,000 g/mol, more particularly, at least 10,000 g/mol. Theweight ratio of acrylic copolymer to the maleic/olefin copolymer may be,for example, from 0.02:1 to 5:1 (where all the materials are 100%active), particularly, from approximately 0.05:1 to 3:1, moreparticularly, from approximately 0.05:1 to 2:1, and more particularly,from approximately 0.05:1 to 1:1. Suitable commercially availableacrylic copolymers include Polyquart® Pro, Polyquart® Ampho 149, andPolyQuart® EcoClean, which are available from Cognis Corporation. Asdiscussed further below, it has been found that Polyquart® Pro andPolyquart® Ampho 149 can be used in combination with other soilresistant agents disclosed herein to provide soil resistant capabilitythat is better than the stain resistance achieved when either agent isused alone.

In some embodiments, the maleic/olefin copolymer has a low molecularweight, preferably less than approximately 20,000 g/mol, preferably lessthan 10,000 g/mol, more preferably less than about 7,000 and still morepreferably less than about 3,000. According to another embodiment of theinvention, the copolymer has a molecular weight from approximately 1,000to 20,000 g/mol, from approximately 2,000 to 10,000 g/mol, or fromapproximately 2,000 to 5,000 g/mol. The term “molecular weight,” as usedherein with reference to the molecular weight of polymers andcopolymers, refers to the calculated average molecular weight value ofthe polymer or copolymer, which one skilled in the art will appreciateto encompass a reasonable percent error as a result of the statisticalmethod applied for such calculation and the variations in the polymermolecules.

Exemplary maleic/olefin copolymers such as Sokalon CP9 and ES8804 aresodium salts produced by BASF. The maleic/olefin copolymer has amaleic/olefin molar ratio from approximately 1:4 to 4:1, preferably fromapproximately 1:2 to 2:1, more preferably approximately 1:1. In oneembodiment, the maleic/olefin copolymer has a molecular weight betweenapproximately 1,000 to 20,000 g/mol and has a maleic/olefin molar ratiofrom approximately 1:4 to 4:1, preferably from approximately 1:2 to 2:1,more preferably approximately 1:1. In another embodiment, themaleic/olefin copolymer has a molecular weight between approximately2,000 to 10,000 g/mol and has a maleic/olefin molar ratio fromapproximately 1:4 to 4:1, preferably from approximately 1:2 to 2:1, morepreferably approximately 1:1. According to a further preferredembodiment, the olefin contains an alkyl group having more than 3carbons, preferably more than 4 carbons. The glass transitiontemperature of the maleic/olefin copolymer is above the use temperatureof the copolymer, preferably above 10° C., and more preferably above 20°C. In some embodiments, a dried film of the maleic /olefin copolymerexhibits an oil/water contact angle ratio of the laminate surface of atleast 2.

The resulting composition can be homogeneous or non homogeneous, can bein the form of solid, liquid including emulsion or dispersion, gel, andpaste, can be a single part or multi part package. The composition mayalso include additional functional materials disclosed below.

A further embodiment of the invention includes a laminate compositioncomprising, consisting essentially of or consisting of a porous ornon-porous floor surface and at least one continuous or non-continuouscoating or layer of the composition adhered to the floor surface by aphysical or chemical bond including, for example, by ionic or covalentbonding. In one embodiment, the laminate comprises a floor substratesurface as a bottom layer and a layer of a soil resistant compositioncomprising the copolymer of maleic/olefin disclosed herein as a toplayer. In another embodiment, a coating is disposed between the bottomfloor substrate surface and the top soil resistant composition layer.The treated floor may be provided by applying the composition to a floorsurface or by embedding the composition into the pore structure of thetreated floor. In a further example, the soil resistant composition canbe embedded in a continuous or non-continuous coating on the floorsurface.

The soil resistant floor treatment compositions of the invention and thetreated surfaces are stable over a relatively wide range of pH values,e.g., between about 3 and about 14. If desired, the soil resistant floortreatment composition can be removed by those skilled in the art by avariety of techniques that can be employed to bring about such removal.One convenient method is by spraying or soaking the treated surface witha removal solution.

In addition to using at least one soil resistant agent as a stand-alonefloor treatment, a cleaning agent may be added to provide a detergentcomposition with stain resistant capability. For example, the cleaningagent may be formed of amines, fatty acids, alkaline sources, salts,solvents, surfactants or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, thecleaning agent is a fatty acid salt formed by the combination of a fattyacid and an alkalinity source. Alkali metals include alkali metals(Group 1 of periodic table) such as Lithium, Sodium, and Potassium andalkali earth metals (Group 2 of periodic table) such as Magnesium andCalcium. The term “alkali metals” is used herein to refer to both alkalimetals and alkali earth metals. In one particular embodiment, thecleaning agent may be formed of fatty acid(s) and alkali metalhydroxide(s), fatty acid(s) and alkali metal carbonate(s), and/or fattyacid(s) and amine(s). For example, the cleaning agent may be a mixtureof oleic acid and monoethanolamine (MEA), or a mixture of fatty acids,such as palm kernel and tall oil, and potassium hydroxide. Although thesingular form of fatty acid, fatty acid salt and alkaline source may beused herein, one skilled in the art will recognize that the acombination of different fatty acids, fatty acid salts and/or alkalinitysources may be used.

The term “fatty acid” includes any of a group of carboxylic acids thatcan be derived from or contained in an animal or vegetable fat or oil.Fatty acids are composed of a chain of alkyl groups and characterized bya terminal carboxyl group. The alkyl groups can be linear or branched.The fatty acid can be saturated or unsaturated. In some embodiments, thechain of alkyl groups contain from 4 to 24 carbon atoms, particularlyfrom 6 to 24 carbon atoms, and more particularly from 12 to 18 carbonatoms. The detergent composition can include combinations or mixtures ofdifferent fatty acids. Examples of suitable fatty acids include oleicacid, palmitic acid, palm kernel fatty acid, coconut fatty acid, talloil fatty acid, and stearic fatty acid, but a broad variety of otherfatty acids or combinations or mixtures thereof are contemplated foruse. Examples of suitable fatty acid-containing detergent compositionsinclude StoneMedic Daily Cleaner Conditioner (DCC), NeoMat Forte andNeoMat S, which are aqueous soap based cleaners all available fromEcolab.

When a fatty acid is used as the cleaning agent in the detergentcomposition, the detergent composition can include an effective amountof one or more alkaline sources to enhance cleaning of a floor surfaceand improve soil removal performance of the detergent composition. Asreferred to herein “fatty acid salt” refers to a fatty acid(s) and oneor more alkaline sources. The alkaline source can be added at such anamount to fully or partially neutralize the fatty acid(s). In somecases, the alkalinity source may be added in excess. In general, it isexpected that the composition may include the alkaline source in anamount (active) of at least about 0.1% by weight, at least about 5% byweight, or at least about 10% by weight.

Examples of suitable alkaline sources for the fatty acid salt of thedetergent composition include, but are not limited to alkali metalcarbonates, alkali metal hydroxides, and amines Alkali metals includealkali metals (Group 1 of periodic table) such as Lithium, Sodium, andPotassium and alkali earth metals (Group 2 of periodic table) such asMagnesium and Calcium. The term “alkali metals” is used herein to referto both alkali metals and alkali earth metals. Exemplary alkali metalcarbonates that can be used include, but are not limited to: sodium orpotassium carbonate, bicarbonate, sesquicarbonate, and mixtures thereof.Exemplary alkali metal hydroxides that can be used include, but are notlimited to sodium, or potassium hydroxide. The alkali metal hydroxidemay be added to the composition in any form known in the art, includingas solid beads, dissolved in an aqueous solution, or a combinationthereof. Alkali metal hydroxides are commercially available as a solidin the form of prilled solids or beads having a mix of particle sizesranging from about 12-100 U.S. mesh, or as an aqueous solution, as forexample, as a 45%, a 50% and a 73% by weight solution. It is preferredthat the alkali metal hydroxide is added in the form of an aqueoussolution, particularly a 45% by weight hydroxide solution, to reduce theamount of heat generated in the composition due to hydration of thesolid alkali material. Although the singular form of fatty acid, fattyacid salt and alkaline source may be used herein, one skilled in the artwill recognize that one or more fatty acids, fatty acid salts and/oralkalinity sources may be present.

Amines are organic derivatives of ammonia in which one or more of theammonia hydrogens are replaced by alkyl or aromatic groups. A variety oforganic amines may be employed in the compositions and methods of thepresent invention. Representative organic amines include alkyl amines,which may be primary, secondary, or tertiary, such as isopropylamine,ethylmethylamine and trimethylamine, or substituted organoamines (e.g.,alkanolamines) such as monoethanolamine, diethanolamine andtriethanolamine, 1,2-diaminoethane, 1,2-diaminopropane,N-benzylethanolamine, 2-aminomethylpropanol, furfurylamine,tetrahydrofurfurylamine and the like, and mixtures thereof, orisopropanolamines such as monoisopropanolamine, diisopropanolamine,triisopropanolamine and the like, and mixtures thereof, or aliphaticether amines such as the Tomamine Ether PA Series and DA Series from AirProducts and the like, and mixtures thereof, or cyclic amines such asmorpholine, or ethoxylate amines such as ethoxylated tallow amine,ethoxylated coconut amine, ethoxylated alkyl propylene amines, theTomamine Ether E-Series from Air Products and the like, and mixturesthereof, or amino alcohol such as 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and thelike and mixtures thereof. In particular, the amine may be anorganoamine which may be accompanied by other amines or by salts of theamines.

In addition to the first alkaline source, the detergent composition maycomprise a secondary alkaline source. Examples of useful secondaryalkaline sources include, but are not limited to: metal silicates suchas sodium or potassium silicate or metasilicate; metal carbonates suchas sodium or potassium carbonate, bicarbonate, sesquicarbonate; metalborates such as sodium or potassium borate; and ethanolamines andamines. Such alkaline agents are commonly available in either aqueous orpowdered form, either of which is useful in formulating the detergentcompositions.

The cleaning agent is present in an amount effective to providedetersive properties. More specifically, the molar ratio of the fattyacid and alkaline source are present in an amount effective to providedetersive properties. An effective amount should be considered as anamount that provides a use composition having a wide pH range of betweenabout 3 and about 14, particularly between about 5 and 10, and moreparticularly between about 7 and about 9.5. Additional pH adjustingagents may be used to provide the use composition with the desired pH.Suitable pH adjusting agents for such alkaline-based compositionsinclude organic and inorganic acids, such as acetic acid, hydrochloricacid, sulfuric acid and citric acid.

The soil resistant composition for floor treatment can be in the form ofliquid, paste, gel or solid. The compositions can be used as provided,or can be diluted with water prior to the applications.

Additional Functional Materials

The soil resistant composition can include additional components oragents, such as additional functional materials. As such, in someembodiments, the soil resistant composition including 1) at least onemaleic/olefin copolymer having a molecular weight of about 1,000 toabout 20,000 g/mol; 2) optionally, at least one amphoteric acryliccopolymer; and 3) optionally, at least one detergent may provide a largeamount, or even all of the total weight of the detergent composition.For example, in embodiments having few or no additional functionalmaterials disposed therein. The functional materials provide desiredproperties and functionalities to the soil resistant composition. Forthe purpose of this application, the term “functional materials”includes a material that when dispersed or dissolved in a use and/orconcentrate solution, such as an aqueous solution, provides a beneficialproperty in a particular use.

Example functional materials include but are not limited to solvents,surfactants, polymers, fragrances, chelating agents such as ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and its sodium salts; pH adjusters suchas amines, acids and pH buffers; foam modifiers such as siliconedefoamers; coloring agents, such as dyes; pearlising agents; wettingagents; stabilizers; and rheology modifiers.

Methods of Use

An embodiment of the invention includes a method for treating a cleansurface comprising, consisting essentially of or consisting of applyingthe soil resistant floor treatment composition to a flooring surface,and drying the floor surface to form a laminate composition. Accordingto a further embodiment, the method comprises, consists essentially ofor consists of applying to a floor surface an aqueous solution ofapproximately 0.005% to 20% maleic/olefin copolymer soil resistantcomposition, wherein said copolymer has a molecular weight fromapproximately 1,000 to 20,000 g/mol, and drying the composition to forma laminate of the soil resistant composition and the floor surface. Thetreated floor surface can then be cleaned with a floor cleaner. Forexample, the treated floor surface can be cleaned to remove soil.

Depending on the specific composition used, the treated floor surfacemay result from a physical bond or chemical bond/interaction (e.g.,hydrogen, ionic, or covalent bonding) of the stain resistant compositionto the floor surface. Methods according to the invention may furtherinclude combining the at least one soil resistant agent with a detergentcomposition in order to clean a surface suitable for treatment with thesoil resistant composition and leaving a residue, such as a coating orlayer of the soil resistant agent, on the clean surface. According to afurther embodiment, the soil resistant composition is not used incombination with cationic surfactants.

The soil resistant composition according to the invention may be appliedto a clean floor surface using an autoscrubber, flat mop, string mop,spray dispenser or other conventional application methods. A surface tobe treated according to the invention may be cleaned using cleaningagents or solvents that will be familiar to those skilled in the art.The method may further include allowing the composition to dry and forma continuous or discontinuous film, layer or coating after applying to aclean floor surface. According to an embodiment of the invention, thesoil resistant floor treatment composition is allowed to remain on thefloor surface for sufficient period of time to enable formation of asubstantially dry-to-touch coating. Preferably the coating is waterresistant, more preferably the coating is water resistant and has lowwater solubility. The dry-to-touch coating formed by the soil resistantfloor treatment composition is adhered or bonded to the clean surfaceand exhibits soil resistant properties minimizing and/or preventingbonding of soils to the surface.

In addition, the step of removing soils from the treated floor surfacemay further include applying a water source, a cleaning agent and/ormechanical force to remove soils. For example, the use ofnon-traditional mechanical force, such as compressed air or a vacuum canbe utilized to clean the treated floor surface. In an embodiment of theinvention, soil on the treated surface is removed using compressed air,alone or combined with water. The step of removing soils from thetreated floor surface may not require a detergent composition for theremoval of soils and/or cleaning of the treated surface to maintain soilrepellency or resistance of the surface. However, soil can be removedwith a cleaning agent if desired.

As a result, the treated floor surface can be cleaned without causingremoval of the soil resistant coating, for extended periods of time. Thetreated floor surface can be cleaned, for example with a deliberate flowof water, such as from a hose or a natural source such as rain forexternal surfaces, without the need to reapply the soil repellantcopolymer composition, for example, for several weeks and even months.When desirable, additional soil resistant floor treatment compositionsmay be applied to a cleaned surface to provide ongoing soil repellency.Alternatively or additionally, the soil resistant floor treatmentcomposition may be combined with one or more detergent compositions andcan be applied, for example, daily, weekly or as needed.

Kits

According to a further embodiment of the invention, the soil resistantfloor composition of the invention can be packaged and provided as a kitfor soil resistant floor treatments. According to an embodiment of theinvention, a kit may comprise, consist of and/or consist essentially ofthe soil resistant composition according to the invention, anapplicator, a removal agent for removing a plurality of soils from atreated floor surface, and suitable instructions for use. Exampleapplicators include but are not limited to: a scrubber, a mop, a rolleror a spray. Examples of suitable scrubbers include manual and auto floorscrubbers. Examples of suitable mops include string and flat mops.

In one embodiment, the kit includes the soil resistant composition and aseparate cleaning agent that may be optionally combined with the soilresistant composition prior to use. In another embodiment, at least oneamphoteric acrylic copolymer may be provided with the soil resistantcomposition or the cleaning agent or may be provided separate.

In a further embodiment, the cleaning system comprises a container,within which is a copolymer of maleic and olefin having a molecularweight from approximately 1,000 to 20,000 g/mol, optionally at least onedetergent, and optionally at least one amphoteric acrylic copolymer. Ina still further embodiment, the cleaning system comprises a firstcontainer and a second container. The first container may hold acopolymer of maleic and olefin having a molecular weight fromapproximately 1,000 to 20,000 g/mol and the second container may hold atleast one detergent. At least one amphoteric acrylic copolymer may beincluded in the first container, the second container or in the thirdcontainer. In use, the contents of the containers may be diluted, andmay be combined prior to or after dilution.

EXAMPLES

Embodiments of the present invention are further defined in thefollowing non-limiting Examples. It should be understood that theseExamples, while indicating certain embodiments of the invention, aregiven by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and theseExamples, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essentialcharacteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spiritand scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of theembodiments of the invention to adapt it to various usages andconditions. Thus, various modifications of the embodiments of theinvention, in addition to those shown and described herein, will beapparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description.Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of theappended claims.

Materials Used

TABLE 1 Material Description Vendor ES8804 Maleic acid/Olefin- BASFCopolymer Capstone ST100 (ST100) 19-20% active solids, DuPont aqueousfluorochemical dispersion Capstone ST300 (ST300) 15% active solids,aqueous DuPont fluorochemical dispersion Wacker HC 303 (HC 303) ~17%solids, finely Wacker dispersed water based Silicones silicone emulsionStoneMedic ASI Absorbent Water based impregnator Ecolab StoneImpregnator that is designed to give protection against both water andoil borne stains on absorbent natural stone, terrazzo, concrete andgrout. Stone Medic DCC Fatty Acid based natural Ecolab stone cleaner andconditioner for daily use NeoMat Forte Fatty Acid based cleaner EcolabNeoMat S Fatty Acid based cleaner Ecolab Bindzil CC30 (CC30) Colloidalsilica solution Akzo Nobel Lithisil 25 Lithium silicate, 23% PQ solutionin water Corporation PolyQuart Pro An acrylic copolymer Cognis EZ Clean200 Acrylic emulsion Dow Sokalon CP9 granulate Maleic acid/Olefin- BASFCopolymer, Na-salt Acusol 929 Acrylic acid homopolymer Dow (43-47%)Prifac 7908 Palm kernel based fatty acid Croda Potassium hydroxide 45%liquid form Various sources Ethylenediaminetetraacetic 47% liquid formVarious Acid (EDTA) sources

White Concrete Grout Coupon Preparation:

Tap water (19.32%) was mixed with PolyBlend Sanded Grout mix (80.68%),Bright White #381, manufactured by Custom Building products. A mold wasfilled with the mixture to form 2″ by 2″ coupons. The coupons were readyto use after 5-7 days ambient curing.

Black Oily Soil Preparation:

The materials set forth below in Table 2 were placed in a beaker andmixed with a stirbar for at least 10 minutes to form a uniform blackoily soil.

TABLE 2 Material weight (g) Mineral Spirits 50.00 Mineral Oil 5.00 10/30W Motor Oil 5.00 Oil Dag (Graphite Lube) 2.50 Bandy Black Clay 37.50

Red Wine Stain:

Cellared and bottled by Charles Shaw Winery, Napa and Sonoma, Calif.,Contains sulfites, ALC: 12.5% by vol.

Example 1

StoneMedic DCC, NeoMat S and NeoMat Forte were diluted with tap water to1.2 wt % and an equal active amount of soil resistant agent was added toprepare Experiments 1-12 as set forth in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Weight (g) 1.2% 1.2% ES8804 HC303 ST300 1.2% NeoMat NeoMat (25%(17% (15% Experiments DCC Forte S active) active) active) #1 25.00 #224.66 0.34 #3 24.50 0.50 #4 24.43 0.57 #5 25.00 #6 24.66 0.34 #7 24.500.50 #8 24.43 0.57 #9 25.00 #10 24.66 0.34 #11 24.50 0.50 #12 24.43 0.57

For each experiment, a white concrete grout coupon was divided evenlyinto two sections. Each section was treated with 1.3 g of the dilutedcleaner and dried overnight. A foam ring having an open center diameterof about 0.5 inch with a thickness of about 0.125 inch was applied ontothe treated surface. The ring center open area was filled with the redwine for 10 minutes. After 10 minutes, the wine inside the ring wasremoved with a dry paper towel, followed by a wet wiping of the groutsurface. The tested area was then wiped with a dry paper towel.

The degree of stain of the grout was evaluated by visual appearance aswell as by Wb and L value measurement with a BYK Gardner SpectroGuide.Table 4 below provides the Wb and L data for each Experiment. A higherdelta Wb or delta L value represents a poorer stain resistance, as thedelta value is calculated by non soiled value—soiled value.

TABLE 4 Ex cou- non-soiled area soiled area delta (non-soiled − soiled)1- pon L Wb L Wb L Wb #1 1 92.65 62.02 67.83 6.03 24.82 55.99 #2 91.9158.07 84.06 31.5 7.85 26.57 #3 2 91.71 57.77 90.33 50.18 1.38 7.59 #492.85 63.97 82.08 37.07 10.77 26.9 #5 3 93.38 63.02 66.81 0.16 26.5762.86 #6 92.69 64.33 65.59 8.9 27.1 55.43 #7 4 92.87 64.85 69.29 11.0323.58 53.82 #8 92.97 64.72 69.29 11.03 23.68 53.69 #9 5 93.39 70.4874.16 14.53 19.23 55.95 #10 93.05 64.7 90.71 52.54 2.34 12.16 #11 694.24 77.25 90.38 57.8 3.86 19.45 #12 94.24 77.25 90.38 57.8 3.86 19.45

These results demonstrate that the addition of ES8804 according toExamples 2, 6 and 10 to a soap based cleaner can reduce surface soilingof pre-treated surfaces. The data also indicates that Experiments 2, 6,and 10 performed comparably to other commercially available stainresistant agents including HC303 and ST300 at the same activity level.

Example 2

For Experiments 13-24, coupons were prepared with the same cleanersolutions as Experiments 1-12, respectively. One application of eachcomposition was applied evenly over white grout coupons with anapplication rate of 2.6 g/in² per coupon. The treated grout coupons wereallowed to dry for at least 12 hours.

An oily soil mixture was applied to the pretreated grout coupons using afoam brush with two passes in perpendicular directions. The soiled groutcoupons were dried for at least 12 hours. The soiled grout coupons wereplaced into cut outs in a customized Gardner Abrader template which wasplaced into the Gardner Abrader tray. The test coupons were submerged in220 g of tap water in the Gardner Abraser Tray for one minute. A1″×2¾″×3¾″ yellow 33PP1 DC sponge supplied by Reilly Foam Corporationwas loaded into the Gardner Abrader carriage with no extra loadedweight, and was passed over each test coupon for 10 cycles. Couponimages were analyzed with Fiji image analysis software to compare mediancolor values among the test samples. Table 5 shows the median colorvalue of the Experiments 13-24 with a higher color value indicating awhiter coupon surface. The higher the median color value or the whiterthe test coupon after cleaning, the more soil resistant properties thecleaner imparted to the sample coupon.

TABLE 5 EX 13-24 Median Color Value 13 176 14 161 15 182 16 223 17 20618 191 19 184 20 215 21 169 22 185 23 192 24 214

This example demonstrates that the surface treated with a soil resistantagent in a soap based cleaner can reduce surface soiling and improveease of cleaning.

Example 3

NeoMat S was diluted with tap water to 1.2 wt % and an equal activeamount of soil resistant agents was added to prepare Experiments 25-28as set forth in Table 6.

TABLE 6 Weight (g) 1.2% ES8804 HC303 ST300 Experiments NeoMat S (25%active) (17% active) (15% active) #25 25.00 #26 24.66 0.34 #27 24.500.50 #28 24.43 0.57

One application of each composition was applied evenly over white groutcoupons with an application rate of 2.6 g per coupon. The treated groutcoupons were allowed to dry for at least 12 hours.

An oily soil mixture was applied to the pretreated grout coupons using afoam brush with two passes in perpendicular directions. The soiled groutcoupons were dried for at least 12 hours. The soiled grout coupons wereplaced into cut outs in a customized Gardner Abrader template which wasplaced into the Gardner Abrader tray. The test coupons were submerged in220 g of tap water in the Gardner Abraser Tray for one minute. A1″×2¾″×3¾″ yellow 33PP1 DC sponge supplied by Reilly Foam Corporationwas loaded into the Gardner Abrader carriage with no extra loadedweight, and was passed over each test coupon for 10 cycles. Couponimages were analyzed with Fiji image analysis software to compare mediancolor values among the test samples as shown in Table 7. Table 7 showsthe median color value of the Experiments 25-28, with a higher colorvalue indicating a whiter coupon surface. The higher the median colorvalue, the whiter the test coupon after cleaning and the more soilresistant properties the cleaner imparted to the sample coupon.

TABLE 7 Experiments Median Color Value 25 180 26 218 27 200 28 212

This example demonstrates that Experiment 26 including ES8804,Experiment 27 including HC303 and experiment 28 including ST300 canreduce surface soiling and increase the ease of cleaning.

Example 4

For Experiments 29-34, grout coupons were treated with aqueous solutionscontaining 0.05% active of the additive set forth in Table 8. The groutwas treated with 1.3 g per ½ coupon of the solution, and 2 applicationswere carried out for each condition. The red wine soiling procedure andthe white concrete grout coupon preparations were the same as describedin Example 1.

TABLE 8 Exp. #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 Additive ES8804 Bindizil Lithisil 25Capstone Capstone (25% CC30 (23% active) ST100 ST300 active) (30%active) (20% (15% active) active)

Both red wine stain and water repelling were evaluated. The waterrepelling ability of the surface after the treatment was carried out byplacing a water drop on the surface and observing the dropletdisappearance absorbed by the coupon. Table 9 shows the Wb values of theExperiments, with a Lower Delta Wb indicating better stain resistance.

TABLE 9 Exp Wb non soiled Wb soiled Delta Wb (non soiled − soiled) #2959.61 42.23 17.38 #30 48.95 6.62 42.33 #31 65.97 8.24 57.73 #32 62.5542.10 20.45 #33 61.32 47.24 14.08

The above results showed that Experiment 29 including ES8804, hadequivalent or better red wine stain resistance when compared to variouscommercially available products ST100 and ST300. ES8804 alsooutperformed Experiments 30 (colloidal silica) and 31 (concretedensifier). Water repelling tests showed similar results, withExperiments 29, 32 and 33 exhibiting water beading while Examples 30 and31 absorbed the water. This example demonstrates that the red wine soilresistance of a porous surface can be significantly improved withES8804.

Example 5

The test evaluated soil resistance of white grout coupons treated withvarious cleaner formulations set forth in Table 10, soiled with theblack oily soil, cleaned via the Gardner Abraser with water, andevaluated by analyzing a scanned image of the coupons with Fiji ImageAnalysis Software. The procedure was the same as that described inExample 2 except that a second application of the cleaner was applied tothe sample coupon at least one hour after the first application.

TABLE 10 PolyQuart Pro Total ppm EX ES8804 (uL) (uL) ST-100 (uL) mLwater of additive 34 200 0 0 999.8 50 35 400 0 0 999.6 100 36 4000 0 0996 1000 37 8000 0 0 992 2000 38 0 217 0 999.783 50 39 0 435 0 999.565100 40 0 4348 0 995.652 1000 41 0 8696 0 991.304 2000 42 0 0 333 999.66750 43 0 0 667 999.333 100 44 0 0 6667 993.333 1000 45 0 0 13333 986.6672000 46 Water Control 47 Water Conrol

Table 11 shows the median color value of the Experiments, with a highercolor value indicating a whiter coupon surface. The higher the mediancolor value, the whiter the test coupon after cleaning and the more soilresistant properties the cleaner imparted to the sample coupon.

TABLE 11 EX Median Color Value 34 146 35 180 36 176 37 154 38 157 39 17140 170 41 196 42 150 43 159 44 188 45 200 46 170 47 154

The results show that ES8804 at 100-1000 ppm concentration (Examples35-36) had a better soil repelling ability than the water control.ES8804 also showed similar or better soil removal than ST100 andPolyquart Pro at the same concentration.

Example 6

The concentrate formulations set forth in Table 12 below were used toprepare Experiments 48-63 as set forth in the Table 13 below.Formulations 1-4 each included Polyquart Pro, a commercially availableacrylic based cleaner from Cognis Corporation. Formulation 5 did not usePolyquart Pro, and experiments using Formulation 5 are labeled ascomparative examples. The various components for each experiment werecombined and shaken for 15 seconds.

TABLE 12 Description Form 1 Form 2 Form 3 Form 4 Form 5 Water DeionizedTNK 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 Polyquart Pro (22%) 7.13 3.56 1.780.89 0.00 EDTA (47%) 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Palm Kernel Based Fatty18.00 18.79 19.18 19.37 19.57 Acid (Prifac 7908) Potassium Hydroxide,9.12 9.54 9.73 9.83 9.93 45% Liquid Water Deionized TNK 20.00 22.3723.56 24.16 24.75

TABLE 13 Tap 1% 1% EZ water ES8804 Clean 200 by Formula in water inwater Experiment Formulation wt. (g) by wt (g) by wt (g) by wt (g) 48Formula 1 222.30 2.70 0.00 0.00 49 Formula 2 222.30 2.70 0.00 0.00 50Formula 3 222.30 2.70 0.00 0.00 51 Formula 4 222.30 2.70 0.00 0.00 Comp.52 Formula 5 222.30 2.70 0.00 0.00 53 Formula 1 211.04 2.70 11.26 0.0054 Formula 2 211.04 2.70 11.26 0.00 55 Formula 3 211.04 2.70 11.26 0.0056 Formula 4 211.04 2.70 11.26 0.00 Comp. 57 Formula 5 211.04 2.70 11.260.00 58 Formula 1 216.25 2.70 0.00 6.05 59 Formula 2 216.25 2.70 0.006.05 60 Formula 3 216.25 2.70 0.00 6.05 61 Formula 4 216.25 2.70 0.006.05 Comp. 62 Formula 5 216.25 2.70 0.00 6.05 63 Water Control

White grout coupons prepared as described above were treated with oneapplication of each composition in table 4. The cleaner compositionswere applied evenly over white grout coupons with an application rate of2.6 g per coupon. The treated grout coupons were allowed to dry for atleast 12 hours.

The cleaner treated grout coupons were soiled with two perpendicularpasses of a foam brush coated with a black oily soil mixture. The soiledcoupons were placed in a Gardner Abraser tray and submerged in 220 g ofcleaning solution. Each of Experiments 15-30 was used to treat at leastone soiled coupon. A yellow 33PP1 DCV sponge from Reilly FoamCorporation was loaded into the Gardner abraser carriage with no extraloaded weight and the sponge was passed over the coupon for 10 cycles.The coupon was then removed and air dried for 24 hours.

An image of each coupon was then scanned as a color “jpeg” image at 300dpi. Fiji image analysis software was used to determine the median colorvalues of the coupons. A higher color value indicates a white groupcoupon, meaning better cleaning performance. The results are set forthin table below 14.

TABLE 14 Condition Median Color Value 48 255 49 254 50 215 51 219 Comp.52 204 53 239 54 254 55 249 56 255 Comp. 57 231 58 241 59 252 60 253 61228 Comp. 62 202 63 165

A number of observations can be made from these results. The resultsdemonstrate that the control (water) had the lowest cleaning efficiency.Of the compositions that included cleaner, Experiments 54-56, includinga combination of ES8804 and Polyquart Pro having its concentrations inthe range of 3.56-0.89% wt in the formula, Experiments 59-60 (EZ Clean200 and Polyquart Pro having its concentrations in the range of3.56-1.78% weight in the formula) and Experiments 48-49 (Polyquart Proonly with its concentrations in the range of 7.13-3.56 wt % in theformula) had the highest overall cleaning efficiency. The ComparativeExperiments, 52, 57 and 62, not including Polyquart Pro did not performas well as the same Experiments with Polyquart Pro.

Additionally, Experiments 55-56 containing ES8804 and 61-62 containingEZ Clean 200 had high cleaning efficiency despite having a reducedconcentration of Polyquart Pro. In comparison, Experiments 50-51 withreduced Polyquart Pro concentrations and no ES8804 or EZ Clean 200 hadsignificantly lower cleaning efficiency. Furthermore the two ComparativeExperiments 57 and 62 containing no Polyquart Pro, but ES8804 or EZClean 200, had a reduced cleaning efficiency in contrast to compositionsalso containing Polyquart Pro. The results clearly indicated that thecombination of Polyquart Pro and ES8804 or EZClean 200, at certaincomponent concentration ranges, can significantly improve the cleaningefficiency over the compositions containing Polyquat Pro only or thesoil resistant agent only.

Moreover the experimental results also demonstrated that the addition ofPolyquart Pro to a fatty acid based cleaner had significantly improvedsoil removal ability. (Experiments 48-51 in contrast to Experiment 18).A similar result was obtained by comparing Experiment 57 to Experiment52 demonstrating that the addition of ES8804 to the fatty acid basedcleaner significantly increased the cleaning efficiency.

Example 7

A 5% wt aqueous solution of ES8804 in DI water was prepared. A 4″×4″marble tile was placed on a leveled surface, and 2.0 g of solution wasapplied to the marble surface to ensure the solution was evenly spreadover the entire surface of the tile. The solution was dried on thesurface overnight. A foam ring having an open center diameter of 0.5inch and a thickness of 0.125 inch was adhered to the treated marbletile and to a non-treated marble tile. The ring center open area wasfilled with regular Coca Cola, which was allowed to dwell on the tilesurfaces for 5 minutes. The Coca Cola was then removed with a dry papertowel, followed by a wet wiping of the tile surface. The tested area wasthen wiped again with a dry paper towel. The degree of etch for themarble tile surface shown in Table 15 was measured with a BYK GardnerSpectroGuide for a 60 degree gloss value averaged from 3 measurements. Alower gloss after etch indicates a higher degree of etch.

TABLE 15 Treated Area Non-Treated Area 60 Degree gloss pre-etch 65 65 60Degree gloss post-etch 51.9 39.8

The example demonstrates that a marble surface treated with ES8804showed significantly reduced surface etch than the non-treated surface.

Example 8

Grout coupons were treated with aqueous solutions containing theadditive set forth in Table below. Sokalan CP9 was dissolved in DI H2Oto form a 25.0% solids aqueous solution (Sokalan CP9 25%) prior tomaking the use solution for grout treatment. All of the use solutionsfor grout treatment were made by mixing 0.20 g of the additive with tapwater to a total weight of 100.0 g. The grout was treated with 1.3 g per1/29 coupon of the solution, and 2 applications were carried out foreach condition. The red wine soiling procedure and the white concretegrout coupon preparations were the same as described in Example 1.

TABLE 16 Exp. 64 65 66 67 68 Additive Sokalan CP9 ES8804 Acusol ES8804Tap H2O (25%) 929 Coupon # Coupon 1 Coupon 1 Coupon 2 Coupon 2 Coupon 3

Table 17 shows the Wb and L values of the Experiments, with a LowerDelta value (non soiled—soiled) indicating better stain resistance.

TABLE 17 Wb non Wb Delta L non L Delta Exp soiled soiled Wb soiledsoiled L 64 57.33 24.61 32.72 91.96 85.19 6.77 65 57.08 23.86 33.2291.88 85.17 6.71 66 67.12 8.78 58.34 92.85 60.90 31.89 67 57.92 26.0631.86 92.09 86.11 5.98 68 62.10 11.08 51.02 92.55 65.12 27.43

The above results showed that Experiment 64 having Sokalan CP9 andExperiments 65 and 67 including ES8804, significantly improved the redwine stain resistance when compared to the water treated coupon. Thisexample demonstrates that the red wine soil resistance of a poroussurface can be significantly improved with ES8804 and Sokalan CP9. Thisexample also demonstrates that Sokalan CP9 performs substantiallysimilar to ES8804.

The inventions described herein, may be varied in many ways. Suchvariations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit andscope of the inventions and all such modifications are intended to beincluded within the scope of the following claims.

1. A floor treatment use composition comprising: a maleic/olefincopolymer having a molecular weight from approximately 1,000 to 20,000g/mol; at least one amphoteric acrylic copolymer; and water.
 2. Thecomposition according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of the acryliccopolymer to the maleic/olefin copolymer is from about 0.02:1 to 5:1. 3.The composition according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of the acryliccopolymer to the maleic/olefin copolymer is from about 0.05:1 to 1:1. 4.A floor treatment use composition comprising: a maleic/olefin copolymerhaving a molecular weight from approximately 1,000 to 20,000 g/mol; atleast one detergent; and water.
 5. The composition of claim 4 furthercomprising at least one amphoteric acrylic copolymer.
 6. The compositionaccording to claim 5 wherein the ratio of the acrylic copolymer to themaleic/olefin copolymer is from about 0.02:1 to 5:1.
 7. The compositionaccording to claim 4 wherein the detergent includes at least one fattyacid salt.
 8. The composition according to claim 4 wherein maleic/olefincopolymer has a maleic/olefin ratio from approximately 1:4 to 4:1.
 9. Alaminate composition comprising: a floor substrate including a surface;a soil resistant coating disposed on the surface, the coating comprisinga maleic/olefin copolymer having a molecular weight from approximately1,000 to 20,000 g/mol.
 10. The laminate composition according to claim9, wherein the soil resistant coating further comprises at least onedetergent.
 11. The laminate composition according to claim 10, whereinthe detergent includes at least one fatty acid salt.
 12. The laminatecomposition according to claim 9, wherein the soil resistant coatingfurther comprises at least one amphoteric acrylic copolymer.
 13. Thelaminate composition according to claim 12, wherein the ratio of theacrylic copolymer to the maleic/olefin copolymer is from about 0.02:1 to5:1.
 14. The laminate composition according to claim 9, wherein the soilresistant coating further comprises: at least one detergent; and atleast one amphoteric acrylic copolymer.
 15. The laminate compositionaccording to claim 9 further comprising a coating between the flooringsubstrate and the soil resistant coating.
 16. The laminate compositionaccording to claim 9 wherein the floor substrate comprises a poroussurface.
 17. The laminate composition according to claim 9 wherein thefloor substrate comprises a non-porous surface.
 18. The laminatecomposition according to claim 9 wherein the soil resistant coating is acontinuous coating.
 19. The laminate composition according to claim 9wherein maleic/olefin copolymer has a maleic/olefin ratio fromapproximately 1:4 to 4:1.
 20. The laminate composition according toclaim 9 wherein said maleic/olefin copolymer is hydrophobicallymodified.